Re: [PATCH 2/2] thp: support split page table lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:46:25PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > Hi Kirill,
> > 
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 01:48:03PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > > > Thp related code also uses per process mm->page_table_lock now.
> > > > So making it fine-grained can provide better performance.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch makes thp support split page table lock by using page->ptl
> > > > of the pages storing "pmd_trans_huge" pmds.
> > > > 
> > > > Some functions like pmd_trans_huge_lock() and page_check_address_pmd()
> > > > are expected by their caller to pass back the pointer of ptl, so this
> > > > patch adds to those functions new arguments for that. Rather than that,
> > > > this patch gives only straightforward replacement.
> > > > 
> > > > ChangeLog v3:
> > > >  - fixed argument of huge_pmd_lockptr() in copy_huge_pmd()
> > > >  - added missing declaration of ptl in do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page()
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Generally, looks good. Few notes:
> > > 
> > > I believe you need to convert __pte_alloc() to new locking. Not sure about
> > > __pte_alloc_kernel().
> > > Have you check all rest mm->page_table_lock, that they shouldn't be
> > > converted to new locking?
> > 
> > I thought that keeping __pte_alloc() using mm->page_table_lock was safe
> > because it uses bare mm->page_table_lock instead of pte_lockptr() even
> > before this patchset, but not 100% sure.
> > __pte_alloc() (and its family) are used in normal page path, so if it's
> > not safe, we've lived with unsafe code for very long (maybe since 2005).
> > Anyway, converting __pte_alloc() into split ptl could improve performance
> > (though we need testing to know what amount), so I'll try that.
> 
> No, before the patch mm->page_table_lock is what we need: it serializes
> setting up pmd, not adding pte to pmd and it's subject to change with new
> locking model.

OK, I see. This is a todo for the next post.
Thank you for explanation.

Naoya

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]