RE: [PATCH 2/2] thp: support split page table lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> Thp related code also uses per process mm->page_table_lock now. So making
> it fine-grained can provide better performance.
> 
> This patch makes thp support split page table lock which makes us use
> page->ptl of the pages storing "pmd_trans_huge" pmds.

Hm. So, you use page->ptl only when you deal with thp pages, otherwise
mm->page_table_lock, right?

It looks inconsistent to me. Does it mean we have to take both locks on
split and collapse paths? I'm not sure if it's safe to take only
page->ptl for alloc path. Probably not.

Why not to use new locking for pmd everywhere?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]