On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:14:19PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I intended to say nr_node_ids, the same size as buffers such as the > > task_numa_buffers. If we ever return a nid > nr_node_ids here then > > task_numa_fault would corrupt memory. However, it should be possible for > > node_weight to exceed nr_node_ids except maybe during node hot-remove so > > it's not the problem. > > The nodemask situation seems somewhat more confused than the cpumask > case; how would we ever return a nid > nr_node_ids? Corrupt nodemask? > ARGH. I meant impossible. The exact bloody opposite of what I wrote. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>