On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:38:11PM +0100, leizhen wrote:
> On 2013/8/24 1:16, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:16:14PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 04:35:29AM +0100, Leizhen (ThunderTown, Euler) wrote:
> >>> This problem is on ARM64. When CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES is not opened, the memory
> >>> map size can be 2M(section) and 4K(PAGE). First, OS will create map for pgd
> >>> (level 1 table) and level 2 table which in swapper_pg_dir. Then, OS register
> >>> mem block into memblock.memory according to memory node in fdt, like memory@0,
> >>> and create map in setup_arch-->paging_init. If all mem block start address and
> >>> size is integral multiple of 2M, there is no problem, because we will create 2M
> >>> section size map whose entries locate in level 2 table. But if it is not
> >>> integral multiple of 2M, we should create level 3 table, which granule is 4K.
> >>> Now, current implementtion is call early_alloc-->memblock_alloc to alloc memory
> >>> for level 3 table. This function will find a 4K free memory which locate in
> >>> memblock.memory tail(high address), but paging_init is create map from low
> >>> address to high address, so new alloced memory is not mapped, write page talbe
> >>> entry to it will trigger exception.
> >>
> >> I see how this can happen. There is a memblock_set_current_limit to
> >> PGDIR_SIZE (1GB, we have a pre-allocated pmd) and in my tests I had at
> >> least 1GB of RAM which got mapped first and didn't have this problem.
> >> I'll come up with a patch tomorrow.
> >
> > Could you please try this patch?
...
> I test this patch on my board, it's passed. But I think there still
> some little problem. First, we align start address and truncate last,
> which will cause some memory wasted.
It truncates the start of the first block, which should really be
2MB-aligned (as per Documentation/arm64/booting.txt).
> Second, if we update current_limit after each memblock mapped, the
> page alloced by early_alloc will be more dispersedly. So I fix this
> bug like below:
I thought about this but was worried if some platform has a small
initial block followed by huge blocks. I'm happy to simply limit the
early memblock allocations to the first block and assume that it is
large enough for other page table allocations.
Also note that this is (intermediate) physical space. Locality would
probably help on some hardware implementations that do TLB caching of
the stage 2 (IPA->PA) translations.
> If page size is 4K, a 4K size level 2 tables can map 1G, so 512G need
> 512 * 4K. And max level 3 tables number is (memblock num) * 2(if both
> head part and tail part not multiple of 2M), 2M = 256 * 2 * 4K. We
> first alloc 2M memory, map it, then free it, and mark current_limit at
> this boundary.
What I don't really like is that it makes assumptions about how the
memblock allocator works. If one wants to take out every page every x MB
you end up allocating more for level 3 tables, so the 2MB assumption no
longer works (and I've seen this in the past to work around a hardware
bug).
So I would rather assume that the first block is large enough and limit
the initial allocation to this block. If anyone complains we can revisit
it later.
So on top of my original patch:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 49a0bc2..f557ebb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -335,11 +335,6 @@ static void __init map_mem(void)
#endif
create_mapping(start, __phys_to_virt(start), end - start);
-
- /*
- * Mapping created, extend the current memblock limit.
- */
- memblock_set_current_limit(end);
}
/* Limit no longer required. */
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>