On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:51:58PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > @@ -1099,8 +1098,7 @@ static void drain_alien_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
> >
> > static inline int cache_free_alien(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void *objp)
> > {
> > - struct slab *slabp = virt_to_slab(objp);
> > - int nodeid = slabp->nodeid;
> > + int nodeid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(objp));
> > struct kmem_cache_node *n;
> > struct array_cache *alien = NULL;
> > int node;
>
> virt_to_page is a relatively expensive operation. How does this affect
> performance?
Previous code, that is virt_to_slab(), already do virt_to_page().
So this doesn't matter at all.
Thanks.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>