Re: [PATCH v2 03/20] mm, hugetlb: fix subpool accounting handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Hello, Aneesh.
>
> First of all, thank you for review!
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:58:20PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > If we alloc hugepage with avoid_reserve, we don't dequeue reserved one.
>> > So, we should check subpool counter when avoid_reserve.
>> > This patch implement it.
>> 
>> Can you explain this better ? ie, if we don't have a reservation in the
>> area chg != 0. So why look at avoid_reserve. 
>
> We don't consider avoid_reserve when chg != 0.
> Look at following code.
>
> +       if (chg || avoid_reserve)
> +               if (hugepage_subpool_get_pages(spool, 1))
>
> It means that if chg != 0, we skip to check avoid_reserve.

when whould be avoid_reserve == 1 and chg == 0 ?

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]