On Mon 19-08-13 12:28:31, Hugh Dickins wrote: [...] > I don't see any point in introducing it now, solely for the > mem_cgroup_iter_cond() loop: that's better served by my patch. OK. Fair enough. I thougt it would be at least clear if we accidently added a code which would require touching the non-existing memcg for !MEMCG case because that wouldn't even compile with this patch. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>