Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] zram/zsmalloc promotion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Luigi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:53:31AM -0700, Luigi Semenzato wrote:
>> During earlier discussions of zswap there was a plan to make it work
>> with zsmalloc as an option instead of zbud. Does zbud work for
>
> AFAIR, it was not an optoin but zsmalloc was must but there were
> several objections because zswap's notable feature is to dump
> compressed object to real swap storage. For that, zswap needs to
> store bounded objects in a zpage so that dumping could be bounded, too.
> Otherwise, it could encounter OOM easily.
>

AFAIR, the next step of zswap should be have a modular allocation layer so that
users can choose zsmalloc or zbud to use.

Seth?

-- 
Regards,
--Bob

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]