Hello, Chris. On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 01:18:31PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 8/14/2013 12:57 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, Chris. > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:03:39PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > >> Tejun, I don't know if you have a better idea for how to mark a > >> work_struct as being "not used" so we can set and test it here. > >> Is setting entry.next to NULL good? Should we offer it as an API > >> in the workqueue header? > > Maybe simply defining a static cpumask would be cleaner? > > I think you're right, actually. Andrew, Tejun, how does this look? Looks good to me. Please feel free to add Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>