Re: [PATCH -mm] mm: Unify pte_to_pgoff and pgoff_to_pte helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:33:36AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > B_it_F_ield_OP_eration, Peter I don't mind to use any other
> > > name, this was just short enough to type.
> > > 
> > 
> > I think it would be useful to have a comment what it means and what
> > v,r,m,l represent.

Sure, maybe simply better names as value, rshift, mask, lshift would
look more understandable. I'll try to use width for mask as well
(which reminds me BFEXT helpers Andrew mentioned in this thread).

> Can it be written in C with types and proper variable names and such
> radical stuff?

Could you elaborate? You mean inline helper or macro with type checks?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]