On 08/12/2013 01:54 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Tony. > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:49:42PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: >> The only fly I see in the ointment here is the crazy fragmentation of physical >> memory below 4G on X86 systems. Typically it will all be on the same node. >> But I don't know if there is any specification that requires it be that way. If some >> "helpful" OEM decided to make some "lowmem" (below 4G) be available on >> every node, they might in theory do something truly awesomely strange. But >> even here - the granularity of such mappings tends to be large enough that >> the "allocate near where the kernel was loaded" should still work to make those >> allocations be on the same node for the "few megabytes" level of allocations. > > Yeah, "near kernel" allocations are needed only till SRAT information > is parsed and fed into memblock. From then on, it'll be the usual > node-affine top-down allocations, so the memory amount of interest > here is inherently tiny; otherwise, we're doing something silly in our > boot sequence. > Again, how much memory are we talking about here? -hpa -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>