On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 03:36:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > No, it doesn't. And this patch-set can be merged first. > > OK, so if nobody objects, I can take patches [1,3-4/4], but I don't think I'm > the right maintainer to handle [2/4]. Given the dependencies, we'll probably need some coordination among trees. It spans across ACPI, memblock and x86. Maybe the best way to do it is applying the ACPI part to your tree, pulling the rest into a tip branch and then put everything else there. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>