Re: [HEADSUP] conflicts between cgroup/for-3.12 and memcg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Michal.

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:22:07AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I have just tried to merge cgroups/for-3.12 into my memcg tree and there
> were some conflicts indeed. They are attached for reference. The
> resolving is trivial. I've just picked up HEAD as all the conflicts are
> for added resp. removed code in mmotm.

Oops, that's me messing up the branches.  I was trying to reset
for-next but instead reset for-3.12 so that it didn't include the API
updates.  Can you please try to rebase on top of the current for-3.12
bd8815a6d802fc16a7a106e170593aa05dc17e72 ("cgroup: make
css_for_each_descendant() and friends include the origin css in the
iteration")?  At least the iterator update wouldn't be trivial, I
think.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]