On wto, 2013-08-06 at 17:16 +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > On 08/06/2013 02:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > This reclaim process is different than zbud_reclaim_page(). It acts more > > like swapoff() by trying to unuse pages stored in zbud page and bring > > them back to memory. The standard zbud_reclaim_page() on the other hand > > tries to write them back. > > I prefer to migrate zbud pages directly if it's possible than reclaiming > them during compaction. I think it is possible however it would be definitely more complex. In case of migration the zswap handles should be updated as they are just virtual addresses. Am I right? Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>