Hi Rafael,
On 08/02/2013 09:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, August 02, 2013 05:14:26 PM Tang Chen wrote:
Besides the phys addr of the acpi tables, it will be very convenient if
we also have the signature of each table in acpi_gbl_root_table_list at
early time. We can find SRAT easily by comparing the signature.
This patch alse record signature and some other info in
acpi_gbl_root_table_list at early time.
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen<tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yanfei<zhangyanfei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The subject is misleading, as the change is in ACPICA and therefore affects not
only x86.
OK, will change it.
Also I think the same comments as for the other ACPICA patch is this series
applies: You shouldn't modify acpi_tbl_parse_root_table() in ways that would
require the other OSes using ACPICA to be modified.
Thank you for the reminding. Please refer to the attachment.
How do you think of the idea from Zheng ?
Thanks.
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 05/18] x86, acpi: Split acpi_boot_table_init() into two parts.
- From: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:11:15 +0000
- Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
- Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>, "rjw@xxxxxxx" <rjw@xxxxxxx>, "lenb@xxxxxxxxxx" <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, "tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxx>, "hpa@xxxxxxxxx" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "tj@xxxxxxxxxx" <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, "trenn@xxxxxxx" <trenn@xxxxxxx>, "yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx" <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx" <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>, "wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "izumi.taku@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <izumi.taku@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mgorman@xxxxxxx" <mgorman@xxxxxxx>, "minchan@xxxxxxxxxx" <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "mina86@xxxxxxxxxx" <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "vasilis.liaskovitis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <vasilis.liaskovitis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lwoodman@xxxxxxxxxx" <lwoodman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "riel@xxxxxxxxxx" <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx" <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx>, "prarit@xxxxxxxxxx" <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>, "zhangyanfei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <zhangyanfei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "yanghy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <yanghy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <51FB5948.6080802@cn.fujitsu.com>
- Thread-index: AQHOjoaq7VOPC5wsY06gQsg+OI/gRpmAe4eAgADlMFD//5hXAIAAkoKQ
- Thread-topic: [PATCH v2 05/18] x86, acpi: Split acpi_boot_table_init() into two parts.
> From: Tang Chen [mailto:tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 3:01 PM
>
> On 08/02/2013 01:25 PM, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> ......
> >>> index ce3d5db..9d68ffc 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c
> >>> @@ -766,9 +766,30 @@
> >> acpi_tb_parse_root_table(acpi_physical_address rsdp_address)
> >>> */
> >>> acpi_os_unmap_memory(table, length);
> >>>
> >>> + return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_OK);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>>
> >
> > I don't think you can split the function here.
> > ACPICA still need to continue to parse the table using the logic
> implemented in the acpi_tb_install_table() and acpi_tb_parse_fadt().
> (for example, endianess of the signature).
> > You'd better to keep them as is and split some codes from
> 'acpi_tb_install_table' to form another function:
> acpi_tb_override_table().
>
> I'm sorry, I don't quite follow this.
>
> I split acpi_tb_parse_root_table(), not acpi_tb_install_table() and
> acpi_tb_parse_fadt().
> If ACPICA wants to use these two functions somewhere else, I think it is
> OK, isn't it?
>
> And the reason I did this, please see below.
>
> ......
> >>> + *
> >>> + * FUNCTION: acpi_tb_install_root_table
> >
> > I think this function should be acpi_tb_override_tables, and call
> acpi_tb_override_table() inside this function for each table.
>
> It is not just about acpi initrd table override.
>
> acpi_tb_parse_root_table() was split into two steps:
> 1. initialize acpi_gbl_root_table_list
> 2. install tables into acpi_gbl_root_table_list
>
> I need step1 earlier because I want to find SRAT at early time.
> But I don't want step2 earlier because before install the tables in
> firmware,
> acpi initrd table override could happen. I want only SRAT, I don't want to
> touch much existing code.
According to what you've explained, what you didn’t want to be called earlier is exactly "acpi initrd table override", please split only this logic to the step 2 and leave the others remained.
I think you should write a function named as acpi_override_tables() or likewise in tbxface.c to be executed as the OSPM entry of the step 2.
Inside this function, acpi_tb_table_override() should be called.
268 void
269 acpi_tb_install_table(acpi_physical_address address,
270 char *signature, u32 table_index)
271 {
I think you still need the following codes to be called at the early stage.
272 struct acpi_table_header *table;
273 struct acpi_table_header *final_table;
274 struct acpi_table_desc *table_desc;
275
276 if (!address) {
277 ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
278 "Null physical address for ACPI table [%s]",
279 signature));
280 return;
281 }
282
283 /* Map just the table header */
284
285 table = acpi_os_map_memory(address, sizeof(struct acpi_table_header));
286 if (!table) {
287 ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
288 "Could not map memory for table [%s] at %p",
289 signature, ACPI_CAST_PTR(void, address)));
290 return;
291 }
292
293 /* If a particular signature is expected (DSDT/FACS), it must match */
294
295 if (signature && !ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(table->signature, signature)) {
296 ACPI_BIOS_ERROR((AE_INFO,
297 "Invalid signature 0x%X for ACPI table, expected [%s]",
298 *ACPI_CAST_PTR(u32, table->signature),
299 signature));
300 goto unmap_and_exit;
301 }
302
303 /*
304 * Initialize the table entry. Set the pointer to NULL, since the
305 * table is not fully mapped at this time.
306 */
307 table_desc = &acpi_gbl_root_table_list.tables[table_index];
308
309 table_desc->address = address;
310 table_desc->pointer = NULL;
311 table_desc->length = table->length;
312 table_desc->flags = ACPI_TABLE_ORIGIN_MAPPED;
313 ACPI_MOVE_32_TO_32(table_desc->signature.ascii, table->signature);
314
You should delete the following codes:
315 /*
316 * ACPI Table Override:
317 *
318 * Before we install the table, let the host OS override it with a new
319 * one if desired. Any table within the RSDT/XSDT can be replaced,
320 * including the DSDT which is pointed to by the FADT.
321 *
322 * NOTE: If the table is overridden, then final_table will contain a
323 * mapped pointer to the full new table. If the table is not overridden,
324 * or if there has been a physical override, then the table will be
325 * fully mapped later (in verify table). In any case, we must
326 * unmap the header that was mapped above.
327 */
328 final_table = acpi_tb_table_override(table, table_desc);
329 if (!final_table) {
330 final_table = table; /* There was no override */
331 }
332
You still need to keep the following logic.
333 acpi_tb_print_table_header(table_desc->address, final_table);
334
335 /* Set the global integer width (based upon revision of the DSDT) */
336
337 if (table_index == ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_DSDT) {
338 acpi_ut_set_integer_width(final_table->revision);
339 }
340
You should delete the following codes:
341 /*
342 * If we have a physical override during this early loading of the ACPI
343 * tables, unmap the table for now. It will be mapped again later when
344 * it is actually used. This supports very early loading of ACPI tables,
345 * before virtual memory is fully initialized and running within the
346 * host OS. Note: A logical override has the ACPI_TABLE_ORIGIN_OVERRIDE
347 * flag set and will not be deleted below.
348 */
349 if (final_table != table) {
350 acpi_tb_delete_table(table_desc);
351 }
Keep the following.
352
353 unmap_and_exit:
354
355 /* Always unmap the table header that we mapped above */
356
357 acpi_os_unmap_memory(table, sizeof(struct acpi_table_header));
358 }
I'm not sure if this can make my concerns clearer for you now.
Thanks and best regards
-Lv
>
> Would you please explain more about your comment ? I think maybe I
> missed something
> important to you guys. :)
>
> And all the other ACPICA rules will be followed in the next version.
>
> Thanks.
--- End Message ---