Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm, page_alloc: add likely macro to help compiler optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 06:27:22PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 02-08-13 11:07:56, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > We rarely allocate a page with ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS and it is used
> > in slow path. For making fast path more faster, add likely macro to
> > help compiler optimization.
> 
> The code is different in mmotm tree (see mm: page_alloc: rearrange
> watermark checking in get_page_from_freelist)

Yes, please rebase this on top.

> Besides that, make sure you provide numbers which prove your claims
> about performance optimizations.

Isn't that a bit overkill?  We know it's a likely path (we would
deadlock constantly if a sizable portion of allocations were to ignore
the watermarks).  Does he have to justify that likely in general makes
sense?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]