On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Yan, Zheng <ukernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> From: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Following we will begin to add memcg dirty page accounting around
> >> __set_page_dirty_
> >> {buffers,nobuffers} in vfs layer, so we'd better use vfs interface to
> >> avoid exporting
> >> those details to filesystems.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> fs/ceph/addr.c | 13 +------------
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
> >> index 3e68ac1..1445bf1 100644
> >> --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
> >> +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
> >> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
> >> if (unlikely(!mapping))
> >> return !TestSetPageDirty(page);
> >>
> >> - if (TestSetPageDirty(page)) {
> >> + if (!__set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page)) {
> >
> > it's too early to set the radix tree tag here. We should set page's snapshot
> > context and increase the i_wrbuffer_ref first. This is because once the tag
> > is set, writeback thread can find and start flushing the page.
>
> OK, thanks for pointing it out.
>
> >
> >
> >> dout("%p set_page_dirty %p idx %lu -- already dirty\n",
> >> mapping->host, page, page->index);
> >> return 0;
> >> @@ -107,14 +107,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
> >> snapc, snapc->seq, snapc->num_snaps);
> >> spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
> >>
> >> - /* now adjust page */
> >> - spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> >> if (page->mapping) { /* Race with truncate? */
> >> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!PageUptodate(page));
> >> - account_page_dirtied(page, page->mapping);
> >> - radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree,
> >> - page_index(page), PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
> >> -
> >
> > this code was coped from __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(). I think the reason
> > Sage did this is to handle the race described in
> > __set_page_dirty_nobuffers()'s comment. But I'm wonder if "page->mapping ==
> > NULL" can still happen here. Because truncate_inode_page() unmap page from
> > processes's address spaces first, then delete page from page cache.
>
> But in non-mmap case, doesn't it has no relation to 'unmap page from
> address spaces'?
In non-mmap case, page is locked when the set_page_dirty() callback is called.
truncate_inode_page() waits until the page is unlocked, then delete it from the
page cache.
Regards
Yan, Zheng
> The check is exactly avoiding racy with delete_from_page_cache(),
> since the two both need to hold mapping->tree_lock, and if truncate
> goes first then __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() may have NULL mapping.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Sha
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>