Re: [PATCH v2 10/18] x86, acpi: Try to find if SRAT is overrided earlier.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/02/2013 09:19 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
......
+phys_addr_t __init early_acpi_override_srat(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	u32 length;
+	long offset;
+	void *ramdisk_vaddr;
+	struct acpi_table_header *table;
+	struct cpio_data file;
+	unsigned long map_step = NR_FIX_BTMAPS<<  PAGE_SHIFT;
+	phys_addr_t ramdisk_image = get_ramdisk_image();
+	char cpio_path[32] = "kernel/firmware/acpi/";

Don't you need to check if ramdisk is present before parsing the table?
You may need something like:

   if (!ramdisk_image || !get_ramdisk_size())
         return 0;

Yes, it is better to do such a check here. But is there a possibility that
no ramdisk is present and we come to setup_arch() ?

......
+
+	return ramdisk_image;

Doesn't this function return a physical address regardless of SRAT if a
ramdisk is present?

Yes, and it is not good. I'll add the check above so that this won't happen.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]