On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:02:50PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:05:51PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:31:59PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > When we try to get a huge page with avoid_reserve, we don't consume > > > a reserved page. So it is treated like as non-reserve case. > > > > This patch will be completely overwritten with 9/18. > > So is this patch necessary? > > Yes. This is a bug fix, so should be separate. > When we try to allocate with avoid_reserve, we don't use reserved page pool. > So, hugepage_subpool_get_pages() should be called and returned if failed. > > If we merge these into one, we cannot know that there exists a bug. OK, so you can merge this with the subpool accounting fix in 6/18 as one fix. Thanks, Naoya -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>