On 2013/7/31 17:39, Sha Zhengju wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2013/7/31 16:51, Qiang Huang wrote: >>> On 2013/7/31 16:23, Sha Zhengju wrote: >>>> Hi list, >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> This issue is first discussed in: >>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136574878704295&w=2 >>>>> >>>>> Then a second version sent to: >>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136776855928310&w=2 >>>>> >>>>> We contacted Sha a month ago, she seems have no time to deal with it >>>>> recently, but we quite need this patch. So I modified and resent it. >>>> >>>> >>>> No, I didn't receive any of YOUR message, only a engineer named Libo >>>> Chen from Huawei connected me recently. I don't approve you to resent >>>> them on behalf of me, and just before you send this you even don't >>>> send me a mail. Besides, after a rough look, I do not see any >>>> innovative ideas from yourself but just rework patches from my last >>>> version. >>>> So I'm strong against this patchset. >>> >>> Sorry if this troubles you. >>> Libo Chen is my colleague, we work together, he sent an email to you on >>> 25 June, to ask about this issue, you said you'll resent it soon, but it >>> didn't happen until now :(, and he asked again the other day and you didn't >>> reply. As we really need to fix this problem(and need it in upstream), so >>> I modified it and sent out. >>> >>> I think split patches, rewrite changelogs and tests, they all kind of work >>> right? Of course, if you mind, I can change it, I just need this fix merged >>> to upstream ASAP. >>> >>> So you want me rewrite this patchset and SOB only you or you want resent this >>> by yourself? I'm ok with both :) >>> >> >> No, you can't send out patches without your SOB...but you can add a line >> in the beginning of the email: >> >> From: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Cooperation is welcomed and I just hated this kind of behavior. I > don't want to block the community, since they're urgent to the patches > and Michal has already reviewed them just now, I won't be so caustic > on it. I'm OK of letting the codes in under the rules of community. > OK, thank you Sha, I just confirmed again, Libo did get your reply, we made a mistake, sorry for that. It is my fault didn't get your permission before the rework, I didn't notice this is that big deal, I'll be more careful next time :). Thanks again. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>