Re: [PATCH 13/18] mm: numa: Scan pages with elevated page_mapcount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 01:22:22PM +0800, Sam Ben wrote:
> On 07/15/2013 11:20 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >Currently automatic NUMA balancing is unable to distinguish between false
> >shared versus private pages except by ignoring pages with an elevated
> 
> What's the meaning of false shared?
> 

Two tasks may be operating on a shared buffer that is not aligned. It is
expected that will at least cache align to avoid CPU cache line bouncing
but the buffers are not necessarily page aligned. A page is the minimum
granularity we can track NUMA hinting faults so two tasks sharing
such a page will appear to be sharing data when in fact they are not.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]