Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 06:08:55PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> >
>> > - if (!pte_none(*pte))
>> > + ptfile = pgoff_to_pte(pgoff);
>> > +
>> > + if (!pte_none(*pte)) {
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
>> > + if (pte_present(*pte) &&
>> > + pte_soft_dirty(*pte))
>>
>> I think there's no need in wrapping every such if () inside #ifdef CONFIG_...,
>> since the pte_soft_dirty() routine itself would be 0 for non-soft-dirty case
>> and compiler would optimize this code out.
>
> If only I'm not missing something obvious, this code compiles not only on x86,
> CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depends on x86 (otherwise I'll have to implement
> pte_soft_dirty for all archs).
why not
#ifndef pte_soft_dirty
#define pte_soft_dirty(pte) 0
#endif
and on x86
#define pte_soft_dirty pte_soft_dirty
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>