Hello, Tang. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:52:53AM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: > The node data should be on local, I agree with that. I'm not saying I > won't do it. Just for now, it will be complicated to fix memory hot-remove > path. So I think pushing this patch for now, and do the local node things > in the next step. I see. As long as it's clearly noted in the patch description and as comment && the behavior is off unless explicitly enabled, it should be fine for now, I think. As currently implemented, the users of memory hotplug would have to pay pretty heavy price in terms of memory locality overhead in general and it could be that the ones missed here might not make noticeable difference anyway. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>