On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 02:10:07PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
...
> >diff --git v3.11-rc1.orig/mm/page_isolation.c v3.11-rc1/mm/page_isolation.c
> >index 383bdbb..cf48ef6 100644
> >--- v3.11-rc1.orig/mm/page_isolation.c
> >+++ v3.11-rc1/mm/page_isolation.c
> >@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #include <linux/page-isolation.h>
> > #include <linux/pageblock-flags.h>
> > #include <linux/memory.h>
> >+#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> > #include "internal.h"
> >
> > int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages)
> >@@ -252,6 +253,10 @@ struct page *alloc_migrate_target(struct page *page, unsigned long private,
> > {
> > gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE;
> >
> >+ if (PageHuge(page))
> >+ return alloc_huge_page_node(page_hstate(compound_head(page)),
> >+ numa_node_id());
> >+
>
> Why specify current node? Maybe current node is under remove.
Yes. One difficulty is that this function doesn't have vma and we can't
rely on mempolicy for node choice. I think that simply choosing the next
node by incrementing node id can be a work around, though it's not the
best solution.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>