On 07/23/2013 01:45 PM, Toshi Kani wrote: > Dave, is this how you are testing? Do you always specify a valid memory > address for your testing? For the moment, yes. I'm actually working on some other patches that add the kernel metadata for memory ranges even if they're not backed by physical memory. But _that_ is just for testing and I'll just have to modify whatever you do here in those patches anyway. It sounds like you're pretty confident that it has no users, so why don't you just go ahead and axe it on x86 and config it out completely? Folks that need it can just hack it back in. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>