Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:21:38PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > First 6 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches.
> >
> > The others are for fixing three bugs.
> > Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used
> > for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems.
> >
> > These patches are based on v3.10.0 and
> > passed the libhugetlbfs test suite.
> 
> Please also add the new tests you have as part of this patch series to
> the test suite.

Okay.

Thanks for reviewing this patchset.

> 
> -aneesh
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]