* Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/19/2013 04:38 AM, Raghavendra KT wrote: > > While measuring non - PLE performance, one of the bottleneck, I am seeing is > > flush tlbs. > > perf had helped in alaysing a bit there, but this patch would help > > in precise calculation. It will aslo help in tuning the PLE window > > experiments (larger PLE window > > would affect remote flush TLBs) > > Interesting. What workload is that? I've been having problems finding > workloads that are too consumed with TLB flushes. Btw., would be nice to also integrate these VM counters into perf as well, as an instrumentation variant/option. It could be done in an almost zero overhead fashion using jump-labels I think. [ Just in case someone is bored to death and is looking for an interesting side project ;-) ] Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>