On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Chen Gang wrote: > Hmm... when anybody says "need respect original authors' willing and > opinions", I think it often means we have found the direct issue, but > none of us find the root issue. Is there an actual problem / failure being addressed by this patch? > e.g. for our this case: > the direct issue is: > "whether need check the length with 'max' parameter". > but maybe the root issue is: > "whether use 'size' as related parameter name instead of 'max'". > in alloc_loc_track(), 'max' just plays the 'size' role. "max" determines the size of the loc_track structure. So these can roughly mean the same thing. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>