Re: [-] drop_caches-add-some-documentation-and-info-messsge.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 01:50:28PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Boris then noted
> (http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1210.3/00659.html)
> that he is using drop_caches to make s2ram faster but as others noted
> this just adds the overhead to the resume path so it might work only
> for certain use cases so a user space solution is more appropriate and
> Boris' use case really sounds valid.

FWIW, I still use it. :-)

And we recently validated anew, a good use case for drop_caches which
was actually already mentioned - repeatable benchmark runs. In this
case, we show how *not* to use it in those benchmark runs. :)

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137276096923390

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]