On 09.07.2013, at 18:01, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 09/07/13 15:56, Dominik Dingel wrote: >> By setting a Kconfig option, the architecture can control when >> guest notifications will be presented by the apf backend. >> So there is the default batch mechanism, working as before, where the vcpu thread >> should pull in this information. On the other hand there is now the direct >> mechanism, this will directly push the information to the guest. >> >> Still the vcpu thread should call check_completion to cleanup leftovers, >> that leaves most of the common code untouched. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dominik Dingel <dingel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> > for the "why". We want to use the existing architectured interface. Shouldn't this be a runtime option? Alex -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href