Re: [PATCH 06/13] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once selected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 05:56:44PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> [2013-07-03 15:21:33]:
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 2a0bbc2..b9139be 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -800,6 +800,37 @@ unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay = 1000;
> >   */
> >  unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_settle_count __read_mostly = 3;
> > 
> > +static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu);
> > +
> > +static int
> > +find_idlest_cpu_node(int this_cpu, int nid)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long load, min_load = ULONG_MAX;
> > +	int i, idlest_cpu = this_cpu;
> > +
> > +	BUG_ON(cpu_to_node(this_cpu) == nid);
> > +
> > +	for_each_cpu(i, cpumask_of_node(nid)) {
> > +		load = weighted_cpuload(i);
> > +
> > +		if (load < min_load) {
> > +			struct task_struct *p;
> > +
> > +			/* Do not preempt a task running on its preferred node */
> > +			struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
> > +			raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
> 
> Not sure why we need this spin_lock? Cant this be done in a rcu block
> instead?
> 

Judging by how find_idlest_cpu works it would appear you are correct.
Thanks very much, I'm still pretty much a scheduler wuss. I know what I
want but not always how to get it :)

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]