On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:19:15PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:21:27PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > o 3.9.0-vanilla vanilla kernel with automatic numa balancing enabled > > o 3.9.0-morefaults Patches 1-9 > > o 3.9.0-scalescan Patches 1-10 > > o 3.9.0-scanshared Patches 1-12 > > o 3.9.0-accountpreferred Patches 1-13 > > > > I screwed up the testing as 3.9.0-morefaults is not patches 1-9 at all and > I only noticed when examining an anomaly. It's a unreleased series that > I screwed up the patch generation for. The conclusions about patches 1-9 > are invalid. I'll redo the testing. > Wow..... I'm a double idiot. 3.9.0-morefaults really is patches 1-9 that was released. The conclusions are ok. I was looking at the unreleased v3 of the series just there and the anomaly is in there. Long day, giving up before I manage to stick my foot in it for a third time. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>