Re: [PATCH -V3 2/4] powerpc/kvm: Contiguous memory allocator based hash page table allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 17:12 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Is CMA a mandatory option in the kernel? Or can it be optionally 
> disabled? If it can be disabled, we should keep the preallocated 
> fallback case around for systems that have CMA disabled.

Why ? More junk code to keep around ...

If CMA is disabled, we can limit ourselves to dynamic allocation (with
limitation to 16M hash table).

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]