On 06/29, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 22:30:41 -0700, Randy Dunlap said: > > > + __ret = __wait_no_timeout(tout) ?: (tout) ?: 1; > > Was this trying to do a wait_ho_timeout(!!tout) or something? No, __wait_no_timeout() means that tout == MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT. But the logic is wrong, we should return zero in this case. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>