On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:38:06PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> +void task_numa_fault(int last_nid, int node, int pages, bool migrated)
> {
> struct task_struct *p = current;
> + int priv = (cpu_to_node(task_cpu(p)) == last_nid);
>
> if (!sched_feat_numa(NUMA))
> return;
>
> /* Allocate buffer to track faults on a per-node basis */
> if (unlikely(!p->numa_faults)) {
> - int size = sizeof(*p->numa_faults) * nr_node_ids;
> + int size = sizeof(*p->numa_faults) * 2 * nr_node_ids;
>
> /* numa_faults and numa_faults_buffer share the allocation */
> - p->numa_faults = kzalloc(size * 2, GFP_KERNEL);
> + p->numa_faults = kzalloc(size * 4, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!p->numa_faults)
> return;
So you need a buffer 2x the size in total; but you're now allocating
a buffer 4x larger than before.
Isn't doubling size alone sufficient?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>