On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:50:32PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 04:34:34PM +0900, Hyunhee Kim wrote: > >> Memory pressure is calculated based on scanned/reclaimed ratio. The higher > >> the value, the more number unsuccessful reclaims there were. These thresholds > >> can be specified when each event is registered by writing it next to the > >> string of level. Default value is 60 for "medium" and 95 for "critical" > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Hyunhee Kim <hyunhee.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > As I mentioned eariler thread, it's not a good idea to expose each level's > > raw value to user space. If it's a problem, please fix default vaule and > > send a patch with number to convince us although I'm not sure we can get > > a stable number. > that's reason to send this patch, can we make a reasonable value to > cover all cases? > which number are satified for all person. I really wonder it. Then, I really wonder how we decide values we have to pass. IOW, how could admin tune the system with any values? > > Thank you, > Kyungmin Park > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a> -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>