Hey Anton, On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:27:44PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 01:44:14AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > [...] > > 3. The reclaimed could be greater than scanned in vmpressure_evnet > > by several reasons. Totally, It could trigger wrong event. > > Yup, and in that case the best we can do is just ignore the event (i.e. > not pass it to the userland): thing is, based on the fact that > 'reclaimed > scanned' we can't actually conclude anything about the > pressure: it might be still high, or we actually freed enough. I'd like to make a safe guard with low notifier rather than ignoring. > > Thanks, > > Anton > > p.s. I was somewhat sure that someone sent a patch to ignore 'reclaimed > > scanned' situation, but I cannot find it in my mailbox. Maybe I was > dreaming about it? :) You seem to work while you're sleeping. Dear Penguin, please, take a rest. :) > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a> -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>