Re: [Part1 PATCH v5 03/22] x86, ACPI, mm: Kill max_low_pfn_mapped

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> No bigge, but why (1ULL << 32) - 1?  Shouldn't it be just 1ULL << 32?
>> memblock deals with [@start, @end) areas, right?
>
> that is for 32bit, when phys_addr_t is 32bit, in that case
> (1ULL<<32) cast to 32bit would be 0.

Right, it'd work the same even after overflowing but yeah, it can be confusing.

Thanks.

--
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]