Dave Hansen wrote: > On 06/11/2013 08:35 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > active/inactive lru lists can contain unevicable pages (i.e. ramfs pages > > that have been placed on the LRU lists when first allocated), but these > > pages must not have PageUnevictable set - otherwise shrink_[in]active_list > > goes crazy: > > I think it's also important here to note if this is a bug that can be > hit _currently_, or if this really is just a preparatory patch for > transparent huge page cache. I've mentioned in cover letter, that don't think the bug can be triggered on current upstream code. > From what I can see, this is _needed_ preparatory work, but it can also > stand on its own because it simplifies things. It should go in sooner > rather than later. Right. -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>