As we have removed the dead code in the vb_alloc, it seems there is
no place to use the alloc_map. So there is no reason to maintain
the alloc_map in vmap_block.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 5c037b9..ad11d4f 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -754,7 +754,6 @@ struct vmap_block {
struct vmap_area *va;
struct vmap_block_queue *vbq;
unsigned long free, dirty;
- DECLARE_BITMAP(alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
DECLARE_BITMAP(dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
struct list_head free_list;
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
@@ -820,7 +819,6 @@ static struct vmap_block *new_vmap_block(gfp_t gfp_mask)
vb->va = va;
vb->free = VMAP_BBMAP_BITS;
vb->dirty = 0;
- bitmap_zero(vb->alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
bitmap_zero(vb->dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->free_list);
@@ -873,7 +871,6 @@ static void purge_fragmented_blocks(int cpu)
if (vb->free + vb->dirty == VMAP_BBMAP_BITS && vb->dirty != VMAP_BBMAP_BITS) {
vb->free = 0; /* prevent further allocs after releasing lock */
vb->dirty = VMAP_BBMAP_BITS; /* prevent purging it again */
- bitmap_fill(vb->alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
bitmap_fill(vb->dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
spin_lock(&vbq->lock);
list_del_rcu(&vb->free_list);
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>