On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:10:30PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > <SNIP> > The main change of behavior is the removal of compact_blockskip_flush > and the __reset_isolation_suitable immediately executed when a > compaction pass completes and the slightly increased amount of > hugepages required to meet the low/min watermarks. The rest of the > changes mostly applies to zone_reclaim_mode > 0 and doesn't affect the > default 0 value (some large system may boot with zone_reclaim_mode set > to 1 by default though, if the node distance is very high). > I'm fine with patches 2, 3 and 4 which make sense independant of the rest of the series. I'm less sure of the rest of the series. Can 2, 3 and 4 be split out and sent separately and then treat 1, 5, 6 and 7 exclusively as a zone_reclaim set please? -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>