On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:10:25AM +0400, Max Filippov wrote: >> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hello arch and mm people. >> > >> > Is it intentional that threads of a process that invoked munmap syscall >> > can see TLB entries pointing to already freed pages, or it is a bug? >> > >> > I'm talking about zap_pmd_range and zap_pte_range: >> > >> > zap_pmd_range >> > zap_pte_range >> > arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode >> > ptep_get_and_clear_full >> > tlb_remove_tlb_entry >> > __tlb_remove_page >> > arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode >> > cond_resched >> > >> > With the default arch_{enter,leave}_lazy_mmu_mode, tlb_remove_tlb_entry >> > and __tlb_remove_page there is a loop in the zap_pte_range that clears >> > PTEs and frees corresponding pages, but doesn't flush TLB, and >> > surrounding loop in the zap_pmd_range that calls cond_resched. If a thread >> > of the same process gets scheduled then it is able to see TLB entries >> > pointing to already freed physical pages. >> > >> > I've noticed that with xtensa arch when I added a test before returning to >> > userspace checking that TLB contents agrees with page tables of the >> > current mm. This check reliably fires with the LTP test mtest05 that >> > maps, unmaps and accesses memory from multiple threads. >> > >> > Is there anything wrong in my description, maybe something specific to >> > my arch, or this issue really exists? >> >> Hi, >> >> I've made similar checking function for MIPS (because qemu is my only choice >> and it simulates MIPS TLB) and ran my tests on mips-malta machine in qemu. >> With MIPS I can also see this issue. I hope I did it right, the patch at the >> bottom is for the reference. The test I run and the diagnostic output are as >> follows: >> >> To me it looks like the cond_resched in the zap_pmd_range is the root cause >> of this issue (let alone SMP case for now). It was introduced in the commit >> >> commit 97a894136f29802da19a15541de3c019e1ca147e >> Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue May 24 17:12:04 2011 -0700 >> >> mm: Remove i_mmap_lock lockbreak >> >> Peter, Kamezawa, other reviewers of that commit, could you please comment? > > Are you all running UP systems? I suppose the preemptible muck Yes, xtensa SMP support is in the middle of forward porting/cleanup process. > invalidated the assumption that UP systems are 'easy'. > > If you make tlb_fast_mode() return an unconditional false, does it all > work again? Actually the only thing that was visibly broken is the test for TLB/PTE coherency, but that incoherency appears to be intentional (and the test is too simple for that). Unconditionally returning false from tlb_fast_mode() doesn't fix that test, but AFAICS it fixes underlying page freeing. -- Thanks. -- Max -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>