On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 08:48:27AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >On Mon 27-05-13 07:51:38, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:12:09PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >> >On Sun 26-05-13 17:06:17, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:00:54AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >> >> >On Sun 26-05-13 13:58:38, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> >> >> As KOSAKI Motohiro mentioned, memory hotplug don't support 32bit since >> >> >> it was born, >> >> > >> >> >Why? any reference? This reasoning is really weak. >> >> > >> >> >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136953099010171&w=2 >> > >> >I have seen the email but that email just states that the feature is >> >broken. Maybe it is obvious to you _what_ is actually broken but it >> >doesn't need to be others especially those who would be reading such >> >changelog later. So if you consider this configuration broken then be >> >specific what is broken. >> > >> >> Sorry for the not enough information. KOSAKI explain more here: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136958040921274&w=2 > >There are still just general claims that _something_ is not highmem >aware. > >Anyway, as it seems that there are some attempts to revive this code >then this discussion is moot. But, just for the future, make sure you >are really specific when you claim that something is broken. Somebody >said it was broken is _not_ a reasoning that would fly. > Got it, thanks Michal. ;-) >-- >Michal Hocko >SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>