On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:07:29PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:19:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:25:36AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > Calling might_fault() for every __get_user/__put_user is rather expensive
> > > because it turns what should be a single instruction (plus fixup) into an
> > > external function call.
> >
> > We could hide it all behind CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP just like
> > might_sleep() is. I'm not sure there's a point to might_fault() when
> > might_sleep() is a NOP.
>
> The patch that you posted gets pretty close.
> E.g. I'm testing this now:
> +#define might_fault() do { \
> + if (_might_fault()) \
> + __might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0); \
> + might_resched(); \
> +} while(0)
>
> So if might_sleep is a NOP, __might_sleep and might_resched are NOPs
> so compiler will optimize this all out.
>
> However, in a related thread, you pointed out that might_sleep is not a NOP if
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is set, even without CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP.
Oh crud yeah.. and you actually need that _might_fault() stuff for that
too. Bugger.
Yeah, I wouldn't know what the effects of dropping ita (for the copy
functions) would be, VOLUNTARY isn't a preemption mode I ever use (even
though it seems most distros default to it).
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>