On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:48:06AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Now that the LRU to add a page to is decided at LRU-add time, remove the
> misleading lru parameter from __pagevec_lru_add. A consequence of this is
> that the pagevec_lru_add_file, pagevec_lru_add_anon and similar helpers
> are misleading as the caller no longer has direct control over what LRU
> the page is added to. Unused helpers are removed by this patch and existing
> users of pagevec_lru_add_file() are converted to use lru_cache_add_file()
> directly and use the per-cpu pagevecs instead of creating their own pagevec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> @@ -452,8 +448,7 @@ int cachefiles_read_or_alloc_page(struct fscache_retrieval *op,
> if (block) {
> /* submit the apparently valid page to the backing fs to be
> * read from disk */
> - ret = cachefiles_read_backing_file_one(object, op, page,
> - &pagevec);
> + ret = cachefiles_read_backing_file_one(object, op, page);
Also remove the declaration and pagevec_init a few lines up? Minor
detail, though.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>