Re: [PATCH 0/12][V3] memcg: make memcg's life cycle the same as cgroup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12][V3] memcg: make memcg's life cycle the same as cgroup
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 15:06:56 +0800
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cgroups <cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: linux-mm-outgoing@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: int-list-linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5195D5F8.7000609@huawei.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6

The subject should be "[PATCH 0/9][v3] ..."

On 2013/5/17 15:02, Li Zefan wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

References:
- [PATCH 0/12][V3] memcg: make memcg's life cycle the same as cgroup
  - From: Li Zefan

Prev by Date: [PATCH 9/9] memcg: don't need to free memcg via RCU or workqueue
Next by Date: Re: [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code
Previous by thread: [PATCH 9/9] memcg: don't need to free memcg via RCU or workqueue
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/5] Obey mark_page_accessed hint given by filesystems v3r1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]