On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:06 AM, HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Currently, __find_vmap_area searches for the kernel VM area starting > at a given address. This patch changes this behavior so that it > searches for the kernel VM area to which the address belongs. This > change is needed by remap_vmalloc_range_partial to be introduced in > later patch that receives any position of kernel VM area as target > address. > > This patch changes the condition (addr > va->va_start) to the > equivalent (addr >= va->va_end) by taking advantage of the fact that > each kernel VM area is non-overlapping. > > Signed-off-by: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > index d365724..3875fa2 100644 > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static struct vmap_area *__find_vmap_area(unsigned long addr) > va = rb_entry(n, struct vmap_area, rb_node); > if (addr < va->va_start) > n = n->rb_left; > - else if (addr > va->va_start) > + else if (addr >= va->va_end) > n = n->rb_right; OK. This is natural definition. Looks good. Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>