In commits 5f95d21fb6f2aaa52830e5b7fb405f6c71d3ab85 and
30bc2ec9598a1b156ad75217f2e7d4560efdeeab we've reworked punch_hole
implementation and there is noting holding us back from using punch hole
on file system with bigalloc feature enabled.
This has been tested with fsx and xfstests.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 5 -----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index f504efa..daffbb8 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3557,11 +3557,6 @@ int ext4_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t length)
if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_ratio > 1) {
- /* TODO: Add support for bigalloc file systems */
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
-
trace_ext4_punch_hole(inode, offset, length);
/*
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>