Re: OOM-killer and strange RSS value in 3.9-rc7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 10 May 2013, Will Huck wrote:

> On 05/09/2013 10:00 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 May 2013, Will Huck wrote:
> >
> > > On 05/02/2013 11:10 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 1 May 2013, Will Huck wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Age refers to the mininum / avg / maximum age of the object in
> > > > > > ticks.
> > > > > Why need monitor the age of the object?
> > > > Will give you some idea as to when these objects were created.
> > > Thanks for your clarify. ;-) But why mininum / avg / maximum instead of a
> > > single value?
> > You can see the age of the oldest and youngest object.
> >
>
> It seems that age = jiffies - track->when; can't accurately describe age of
> each used object in one slab. The objects in one slab should be same age in
> current logic, but jiffies are changed when each time enter into add_location.

The objects could be allocated at any time. The track structure is per
object not per slab.

The "age" refers to the time in jiffies since object allocation.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]