Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make the batch size of the percpu_counter configurable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 13:32 +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Tim Chen wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> > index d5dd465..5ca7df5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct percpu_counter {
> >  	struct list_head list;	/* All percpu_counters are on a list */
> >  #endif
> >  	s32 __percpu *counters;
> > +	int *batch ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> >  };
> 
> What is this for and why does it have that alignmend?

I was assuming that if batch is frequently referenced, it probably
should not share a cache line with the counters field.

Tim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]